Thanks for your feedback Rigario. Appreciate it and just what I was looking for
Too much Info: Good point, we’ll look at trimming it. We assumed that as the whitepapers are an academic type article we should at least put some context, but your point is fair.
Too much to do: It is a super aggressive timeline, you’re right. We’ll add more content on our timelines / deliverables / action plans - but it’s a balance as we don’t want to add too much info to the doc. we’re further along the path than what our timeline suggests, but I agree.
Goals: Same as above, good point we will elaborate on this.
you’re right when you say we’re tying to solve multiple problems at the same time. We thought of trimming the offering down to only focus on the Advertiser to Member payment, where a distributed ledger and smart contracts are a perfect solution to reducing cost and increasing settlement frequency - but without the members having access to their funds we are limited in our growth scope.
Most of the member profile we’re attracting are general consumers. To them cryptocurrency is something they’ve heard of, but they’re not technical. We’re trying to give them an avenue to enter the market without requiring a deeper understanding of the market, wallets, exchanges etc.
Having said that, it may be simpler to enable redemption to external wallets.
As for the pricing, with a finite supply of tokens in the market, and because of our policy of buying back tokens to issue to our members as rewards, our models show this will drive up demand for the token and increase pricing over time. It is however not adequately explained, so we’ll spend more time expanding on the model.
thanks again for your feedback, it’s appreciated. any other comments would be welcomed.